The research aimed to identify the effect of using micro-teaching supported by computers on learning motivation and the level of performance of the total exercises with the stick for students of the second year at the Faculty of Sports Sciences in Zagazig, and the researchers used the experimental approach on a sample of (20) students in the second year of the Faculty of Sports Sciences in Zagazig, they were divided into two groups, one experimental and the other a control strength of each (10) students, and research tools: Learning motivation scale - high intelligence test - evaluation of the performance level of the total exercises with the stick - educational program using micro-teaching supported by computer, and the following statistical methods were used: arithmetic mean - standard deviation - median - torsion coefficient - test "T" - simple correlation coefficient - improvement rates. Among the most important results: 1- The use of micro-teaching supported by computers has a positive impact statistically at the level of 0.05 on the motivation of learning, and the level of performance of the total exercises with the stick for students of the second year of the college. 2- The use of the learning style (the usual method) affects a statistically significant positive effect at the level of 0.05 on the level of performance of the total exercises with the stick, while there are no statistically significant differences in learning motivation. 3- There are statistically significant differences at the level of 0.05 between the two-dimensional measurements of the experimental and control groups in the motivation of learning and the level of performance of the total exercises with the stick in favor of the experimental group. 4-The experimental group (computer-supported micro-teaching) outperformed the control group (learning by command) in the rates of improvement of the distance measurement from the tribal in the motivation of learning and the level of performance of the total exercises with the stick, where the improvement rates for the experimental group ranged between (15.38% - 650.00%), while the improvement rates for the control group ranged between (2.38% - 627.27%).