Urban resilience has become crucial in urban planning as cities face increasing challenges from climate change and rapid urbanization. This research examines two main urban resilience frameworks “equilibrium resilience and non-equilibrium resilience” by analysing their application in three cities: New York, Rotterdam, and Singapore. The aim is to evaluate the strengths and limitations of these frameworks in different urban contexts and provide insights for improving resilience in Egyptian cities, addressing environmental, social, and economic challenges. The methodology employs descriptive, analytical, and comparative approaches. New York illustrates an equilibrium resilience model (engineering), focusing on rapid disaster recovery. Rotterdam demonstrates an equilibrium resilience model (ecological), emphasizing long-term adaptation, particularly in water management. Singapore presents an evolutionary resilience model, blending immediate response with long-term sustainability. The study underscores the importance of crafting resilience strategies tailored to specific urban contexts, balancing immediate recovery with long-term adaptation to address emerging and unpredictable risks. Results show that equilibrium resilience effectively facilitates rapid recovery and system stability but lacks the flexibility needed for sustained adaptation over time. In contrast, non-equilibrium resilience promotes transformation and adaptability but demands substantial resources and strong governance coordination. To address these challenges, the study introduces a Hybrid Resilience Model, which merges the strengths of both frameworks. This model enables Egyptian cities to recover quickly while building sustainable, long-term adaptability to climate risks.