| Journal: |
The Egyptian Journal of Surgery
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
|
Volume: |
|
| Abstract: |
Background
Laparoscopic drainage of appendicular abscess has become a novel technique due
to its advantages over interventional radiology like a complete exploration of the
abdomen, exclusion of other pathologies, excision of the appendix at the same
session, better cosmesis, decreased incidence of wound infection, better
visualization of surgical field, fine handling of edematous tissue and drainage of
multiple collections.
Patients and methods
This randomized controlled clinical trial included all patients who developed the
manifestations of appendicular abscess and were referred to the Zagazig University
Hospital Emergency Department between January 2020 and February 2022. The
study was prospectively approved by the Zagazig University Faculty of Medicine
Institutional Review Board (Approval Number: 9871/26-9-2022), and was
retrospectively submitted to clinicaltrials.gov in June 2022 (ClinicalTrials.gov ID:
NCT05419440). The sample size was 172 patients divided into two equal groups, a
laparoscopic group involved 86 patients (group 1) and an interventional radiology
group involved 86 patients (group 2).
Results
Group 1 (laparoscopic drainage group) included 86 patients: 55.8% were males,
with a mean age of 41.2 SD 12.2 years-old, while group 2 (interventional radiology
group) included 86 patients: 51.2% were males, with a mean age of 36.8 SD 10.9
years-old. The incidence of reported complications in group (1) was 1 (1.2%) for
bowel injury, 3 (3.5%) for fecal fistula, 0 (0%) for recurrence, 0 (0%) for pelvic
collection and 0 (0%) for mortality while in group (2) were 5 (5.8%) for bowel injury, 0
(0%) for fecal fistula, 3 (3.5%) for recurrence, 8 (9.3%) for pelvic collection and 1
(1.2%). The incidence rates of quality of life in group (1) were 48 (55.8%) for
excellent quality of life, 38 (44.2%) for good quality of life and 0 (0%) for poor quality
of life, unlike group (2), the incidence rates of quality of life were 12 (14%) for
excellent quality of life, 59 (68.6%) for good quality of life and 15 (17.4%) for poor
quality of life.
Conclusion
Laparoscopic management of appendicular abscess was safely applied in a good
experienced hand without the need for interval appendectomy.
|
|
|