المكانه السوسيومتريه

Introduction:The Human 1s a sociable creature, and witbouthis membership of One or more then a group he 108aeshis humanity chara cterist Lca , therfore ; The person,from his birth, 1s a member ot more than group, Ex:The f.amily, the associates, and the c~a8sroom group,e ct , The number, the importance, andtbe influenceof these groups IneresSf with tb’e individualdevelopement, It is note worthy tbat, the inividualachlves the member ship of aome ot these groups, andprescribes the membership of the other, As a resulteof tbe metuel interactions between the individualand the otber members of the group, there is anetwork of social relations which ties them all.Determining or individual sociometric statusCepeada on measuring such relations.Problem ot the atu~:The studJ’ searches the effect ot the lemil” size,and its CUlture level~oD the individual Social maturityand bis success in mati. 8a\1s.tactory rel.tloaswith his group memberes, and.ther by on h18 80c10 •• t_ric status. lor 8econdaZ’J’ scbool stUdent ••In oher sense. the etu~ answers the ~ollow1Dcquestions:I\!,{iI~.~f/... - - --_ -----._----- ..... ~~. ..-21. Are tbere ”cI1tte renees between tbe 9me11, t beaverget and the big tuml11es sized children,in sociometric status SCOres?2The seme question fOr the two sexes.-~.Are there differences between. Th( bigher t andtbe lower CUlture level temilies ebildren, in8oclomet~lc status Scores?4. Tbe Same question tor the two sexes.5· Do tbe personalit,y traits .ot tbe higber soeiolll8_trie e t e t ua membera (fbe sters) , ditter thsnsuch of the lower sociometric status members(The Isolates).?6Do the peraonelit,y treir ot tbe stars, dittertben sueb ot tbe iSOletes members trom the samesex?7. Do the personelit,y treits ot males, dlttsr tromthan such ot females, trom the same status ?Aims ot tbe studZ:The present ef;ud¥ aJJue at kn01l.i.n8:1. - ~h6 ette ct ot the talti.],r s1ae On tJJe hcl1UdualSociometric status..•..’”’\_~...•.•.•...,iII2. The effect of the family oUlture level on theindividual sociometric status.]. The personality traits of the Sociometric extramistsindividuals (the group stars, and isolates),from the two sexes. For secondary school students.St ud,y evidence:nvidence of the study goes back to the fact. Thatit throws the ligr,t on some SOcialvariablea, whichhave a great importance for person life, and affect hissociometric status between bis class mates. Plus, theknowldge of the personality traits of the isolatesmembers which aida on counselling, and gUidance processes for them.Pr~vious stUdies:£revioua stUdies have been divided into two groupS,with rtspect to: the elm, and the variables which Itna ve at ud,yed.1. StUdies deal with, sociometric status Bnd thevariables of tbe stu~.~. Sudies deal with, sociometric status aDd otherveriables.I\4 -Hypot beses :Hypotheses are formulated as an attempt to answertile questIons raised in t he problem of the study- T~eyare formulated as follows:I. There are statistically significant differencesbetween children of small, of average, and ofbig sized families, on sociometric status scoresfavouring those of small sized families.e. There are statistically significant difterlncesbetw€en girls Of small, ot a verage, andof big sized families on sociometric statusscares , favouring those of small sizedfamilies.b. There are s ta t1st it icall) significant dit fel’encesbetween: boys of small, ot average,and ot big sized families, on sociometricstatus Bcorss, favouring those ofsmall sized familieseII. There are statistically s!gn1ticant ditterencesbetween children ot higher cu~ture 18941 fea11188and children of lower culture level ramilies. Onsociometric status scores, teyeu.r1Dg tboae othiher culture level lemillee.5e. There are statisticslly significant differencas,between girls Of higher cUlt~ level familias,and girla of 10war cUlture leval,on sOciometricstatus scores, favouring tboae, of bigher cUlturalevel families.b. There are statiatically aignitcsnt dittarsnceabetween, boys of bigber cUlture level familiesend boys of lowe~ cUlture level familiee, onsociometric status scores, f~our1ng tnese Ofnigher cUlture level families.III. There are statistically Signiticant ditterencea,between: stara and isolates ot tbe group, Onthe mean Of personality traits acores, dominance,respansability, emotional stebilltsy, and sociability,as meaSUred by GORDON personal prOfile,favouring of iaolates On dominance trait, andOf stars on the rest traits.a. There are etetiatitically significant difte~nca,between stsrs and isolates trom tbs same sex inthe previous personality treits, scorea, taYoUr1aeisolutes on dominance trait , and ot stare on therest traits.--\6b , Personality traits of boy~ don’t differ fro!’!1 thoseof girls, from the ssmeatatue.3arnpling:Subjects are taken from second year secondary,scientific section, from SHRKIA governorate schools,They were J6J students- The data of 11) of thesesubjects, were aliminated.1i-e the~e8ts were 250sUbjects of average intelligence, and socio-economicleve 1-\Y\This sampling consist of 120 ales Bnd 130females -Tools: Consist of:a. Cantrol tools:1- Pictorial intelligence test,by: Abmed Zaklo>sleb •2. Porm ot familY soclo-economlc level by:Zakaria KL- Sberblni • Yousria Anwar Sadekb. Measuring Tools:1. Gordon pers0II81 protile teat, by: Gaber AbdRL~8lDid tl Foed Abu Batb.2. form at tand.l3 culture level, I).y: Zeteri.EL-Sberbi.DI • Yo_rIa Aawar Sedek.- 8 -II. R~sults of second Hypotbese:(The relation between socio’metric status and tbeculture level of the famil).).8- Children of bigher culture level families arehigher sociometric status than those of lowerculture level familiesb.girls of higher culture level families. erehigher sociometric status, than, those of lowerculture level families.c. There are no differences between boys of thetwo levels of families culture level.III- Resultea of third Hypothese:(The porsonality traits of the extremists me~bers)8- Stars are more responsible, emotionally stabilityand sociability, than the 18014te$ members whears,there are no differences between them on thedominance trait scoresb-Star bOIs are more emotionelll stable, than tbelsolateboys_ Whear& tbere 8~e no ditterencesbetween them on tbe rest traits scores.c- Star girls ere more respoD88b1l1t1 aesociability t than tbe 18018te glr18. wbe.~ thereare oodltterences betwesD them on ’be re.’ ’ra1tsscores -9d- Isolate boys are more ~esponaab111ty than isolategirls, whears there are no differences betweenthem on the rest traits scorese.Ster. boys ere more emotionally stable than stargirls, whears it 1s tbe opposite ror sociabilitytrait scores, wh11e there ·areno differencesbet”fEen them on the .re at traits scores.