Background Plane warts, when multiple and recurrent, present a therapeutic challenge acting as a source of reinfection, causing frustration and affecting a patient’s quality of life. For large numbers of lesions in cosmetically significant sites, topical treatment is preferred to avoid potential sequelae. Objectives To evaluate and compare the efficacy and tolerability of tazarotene 0.1% gel vs. imiquimod 5% cream for the treatment of plane warts. Methods In a parallel three-arm randomized controlled trial, 60 patients were randomized to imiquimod, tazarotene or placebo groups. Patients applied the corresponding treatment once daily at night for a maximum of 12 weeks. Primary outcomes were the percentage of respondents with complete clearance in the three studied groups, and the type and frequency of side-effects in each group. Results Both active treatments resulted in significant improvement compared with baseline and the placebo group (P=0.001). The imiqui- mod 5% treated group showed complete clearance in 50% (10/20) of patients, partial response in 15% (3/20), and no response in 35% (7/20). Tazarotene 0.1% gel showed complete clearance in 40% (8/20) of patients, partial response in 40% (8/20), and no response in 20% (4/20). No significant difference was detected between the imiquimod and tazarotene groups (P=0.19). Conclusions Compared with imiquimod, tazarotene 0.1% gel for the treatment of plane warts seems to offer an equivalent treatment response, it maintained efficacy without recurrence and had a safer profile regarding dyspigmentation with an advantageous cheaper cost.