Journal: |
Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
Springer Nature
|
Volume: |
|
Abstract: |
Abstract
Background Colonic anastomotic leak and fistula following anterior resection surgery for rectal cancer are associated with
high mortality rates. The incidence of occurrence varies from 2 to 25% and it is difficult to accurately calculate the incidence
of fistula and leak post anterior resection, as most of them are asymptomatic. Endoscopic management of fistula and leak
has become the first line of management after conservative management in many gastrointestinal surgical centers with the
advantages of being less invasive, shorter length of post-operative hospital stay, effective and rapid recovery in comparison
to revision surgery. Effective endoscopic management for colonic fistula or leak depends on the clinical status of the patient
and fistula characters (time-to-occur and size and site of defect), and device availability.
Methods This prospective randomized controlled clinical trial included all patients who developed the manifestations of
low output recurrent colonic fistula or leak after colonic anterior resection for rectal cancer at Zagazig University Hospital
between (December 2020 and August 2022). Sample size was 78 patients divided into two equal groups. Endoscopic group
(EG): included 39 patients who underwent endoscopic management. Surgical group (SG): included 39 patients who underwent
surgical management.
Results The investigators randomized eligible 78 patients into two groups: 39 patients in SG and 39 patients in EG. The
median size of the fistula or leak was nine (range: 7–14) mm in EG, versus ten (range: 7–12) mm in SG. Clipping and
Endo-stitch device were used in 24 patients versus 15 patients, respectively, in EG while primary repair with ileostomy, and
resection & anastomosis were used in 15 patients versus 24 patients, respectively, in SG. Recurrence, abdominal collection,
and mortality were the post procedure’s complications with incidence of occurrence of 10.3, 7.7 and 0%, respectively, in
EG versus 20.5, 20.5 and 2.6%, respectively, in SG. Excellent, good, and poor were the parameters for quality of life with
incidence of occurrence of 43.6, 54.6 and 0%, respectively, in EG versus 28.2, 33.3 and 38.5%, respectively, in SG. Median
hospital stay was one (range: 1–2) day in endoscopic group, and seven (range: 6–8) days in SG.
Conclusion Endoscopic intervention may offer a successful modality in managing low output recurrent colonic fistula or
leak after anterior resection for rectal cancer that did not respond to conservative measures in stable patients.
ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05659446.
|
|
|