Abstract: |
This study examined the impact of dietary limonene treatment on the growth performance,
immune response, and disease resistance of common carp, Cyprinus carpio. The fish were fed with
either a control diet (CTL; no limonene supplementation) or four experimental diets containing 50
(50 L), 100 (100 L), 200 (200 L), and 400 (400 L) mg/kg limonene over a 70-day period, followed
by Aeromonas hydrophila challenge. The 200 L treatment resulted in a significant decrease in FCR
compared to the CTL treatment. The highest post-challenge mortality was associated with the CTL
treatment (62.7%), while the 200 L treatment had the lowest mortality (30.7%). Before the challenge,
dietary limonene significantly increased humoral and skin mucosal immune parameters compared to
the CTL treatment. The highest leukocyte, lymphocyte counts, skin mucosal protease activity, and
intestinal lactic acid bacteria were observed in the 200 L treatment before the challenge. The highest
plasma lysozyme activity was observed in the 400 L treatment, whereas the highest skin mucosal
lysozyme and peroxidase activities were observed in the 100 L and 200 L treatments before the
challenge. There were no significant differences in the blood neutrophil, monocyte, and eosinophil
counts, humoral alternative complement activity, skin mucosal alkaline phosphatase activity, and
the intestinal total viable bacteria among the treatments before the challenge. After the challenge,
the 200 L treatment exhibited the highest leukocyte, neutrophil, and monocyte count, skin mucosal
immune parameters, and intestinal lactic acid bacteria, whereas the highest blood eosinophil count
was observed in the 100 L, 200 L, and 400 L treatments. At this time, the lowest blood lymphocyte
counts were observed in the 100 L and 200 L, but the lowest intestinal total viable bacteria were
observed in the 100 L, 200 L, and 400 L treatments. Based on these findings, dietary limonene at
200 mg/kg is ideal for common carp to promote feed efficiency, innate immunity boosting, and
resistance against A. hydrophila.
|
|
|