It is hoped that I have succeeded in explaining: that all of God’s laws are guidance and light, but Satan refused that God’s revealed laws be the ruling, so he made human beings stand upright, disregarding women’s rights. Huh, and they began to distort and switch. And that the legislation of commissioned specifics does not come haphazardly, but rather it must have holistic purposes, even if its jurisprudence is absent from the minds. And that a nation of misleading people thought that the Creator oppressed the woman when he created for her legislation that is specific to him from the man and is distinguished! The unquestioned right is that men and women are equal in the origin of morality, and the legal discourse is directed towards them by assignment, but the self-formation of each of them affects the validity of the assignment. And that perfect equality between a man and a woman is not right when what a man has is the same as what a woman has, and what she has for him, otherwise what is the moral distinction between them? It becomes clear that the legal rulings are compatible with the nature of each of them. Hence, the guardianship of a man over a woman - for example - is not domination or invocation of oppression and humiliation, but rather it is honor, care, and altruism by enduring dilemmas.