The researcher should review the ideas of others, the methods they used and the research methods they followed with scientific honesty, their observations and recommendations, and mention the texts related to the topic of research and the opinions of others in them. A thought or a right of ownership, even if it does not agree with what the researcher calls for, and thus the researcher is only a student of those who preceded him from the researchers, because their achievements and the stages they reached are bridges built for the researcher to walk on and through which he reaches other results that complement what the predecessors started In addition to being scientifically honest. Be careful and careful in mentioning the words of others and their intent, taking into account the scientific honesty. Deliberation and taking caution and caution in conveying ideas from others help the researcher’s scientific research and ensure that he follows the method of scientific honesty without prejudice to the intention of others, which prevents the researcher from issuing emotional and urgent judgments without realizing that cause A breach and deficiency in the researcher's style, and a decrease in the level of scientific integrity with which the researcher worked.