The study presents the problem of banality as a prominent problem in the post-modern age, with the rise of globalization trends and political struggles concerned with economic and advertising booms at the expense of any other phenomena. Thus philosophy opens up this vital subject because it mixes with many political, epistemological and religious values and practices. The study thus discusses the most important views of contemporary philosophers who have addressed those issues that denote aspects of trivialities or criticize the rise of the meaningless meaning that has taken its positions strongly in all postmodern products. The study considers that the validity of banality as a philosophical issue is a first thing to point out, because it is not like abstract problems, but rather by virtue of its association with daily human phenomena that reveal a general perception of the world and life. Such as: "flat truth", "repression of repetition", "sudden transformation", "denial", "inflation of ideas", "mental lightness", "fraudulent rhetoric". And if we observe concepts that have a holistic nature with the tyranny of the culture of commodification and circulation and the popularity of superficial ideas and the similarity of shapes and minds and the dominance of modes and intellectual and ideological brands. From that angle, ridiculousness differs from any topics with philosophical titles such as: tampering, nausea, alienation and evil ... Most of these are individual psychological data. As for banality, it harms a collective pattern and accumulated practices. It does not leave its load in the open, but it covers it with justifications related to action and society, and it is internally necessary to pick up the near results and offer an alternative form of auxiliary aspects (such as life characteristics related to the lifestyle). So, in the midst of the banality that is almost devouring the contemporary aspects of our lives, does banality give philosophical content? And if so, what about its limits? Is it a picture or a lifestyle that distinguishes people and no one else? Why does he find what is trivial socially popular through the secretions of globalization, consumer economics and the mass market masses? Are there serious people while there are fewer people? Is it correct to describe a collective entity in general that has no standards? Does vanity apply to individuals as a humanitarian act or to some things and events? Is it an offer or a fundamental feature of the same humanitarian act? The questions deserve a special philosophical attention. In its wake, the dimensions of current life and their management are evident in human beings. The questions are an opportunity to philosophize in its aspects that deal with secondary and marginal knowledge of the reality of triviality. And why not ... things like that were remarkably overwhelmed with the vocabulary of technology, capital markets, the chaos of the populist actor, and the explosion of information and communication knowledge. In the face of that, the study presents a philosophical view on issues that seem worthless, lying on the streets of daily life, but issues that play a serious role in its field. The study uses a dual path: the crystallization of what is vital, but it takes the form of shallow and neglected. Then: interrogating Al-Satehi to know any details inside it, why it remains hidden and taking the necessary characteristic. In this study, the study believes that contemporary philosophy has provided a great deal of inspiration for trivialities. Rather, what belongs to philosophy (whether principles or ideas) differs from what is insignificant. In his cosmic perspective, philosophy is a humane exercise of originality. Because every philosophy has invented its unique authenticity from Greece until now, and in any case has been moving something rich in the mind. The study contains several important points: First: Introduction. Second: The banality as a problematic matter. Third: Philosophical Prospects. Fourth: paradigm of banality. Fifth: Vanity and appearance. Sixth: The power of banality. Seventh: banality and truth. Eighth: Conclusion: (philosophy as an anti-insignificant drug) and the most important references.