Zagazig University Digital Repository
Home
Thesis & Publications
All Contents
Publications
Thesis
Graduation Projects
Research Area
Research Area Reports
Search by Research Area
Universities Thesis
ACADEMIC Links
ACADEMIC RESEARCH
Zagazig University Authors
Africa Research Statistics
Google Scholar
Research Gate
Researcher ID
CrossRef
Effect of surfactants on response of promethazine PVC-membranes
Faculty
Science
Year:
2006
Type of Publication:
Article
Pages:
307-323
Authors:
Zareh, Mohsen M, Shohiab, Raga E, Abd-El-Fatah, Mostafa
Journal:
TURKISH JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY SCIENTIFIC TECHNICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL TURKEY-TUBITAK
Volume:
30
Research Area:
Chemistry; Engineering
ISSN
ISI:000239913800006
Keywords :
effect of surfactant on PVC-membranes, promethazine determination, promethazine-selective electrode
Abstract:
The effect of surfactants (cationic, anionic and non-ionic) on the performance of plastic membrane promethazine electrodes was studied. Three electrodes with membranes containing either sodium tetraphenylborate, sodium tetraphenylborate + 18-crown-6, or 18-crown-6 were prepared. The cationic and the anionic surfactants exhibited potential shifts and a super-Nernstian slope of the calibration graphs. The non-ionic surfactant did not cause alterations in the calibration graphs. The effect of surfactants' concentrations was investigated. The performance characteristics of these electrodes were studied. The slopes of the calibration graphs of the 3 electrodes were 54.4, 54.9 and 48.4 mV/ decade. The rectilinear ranges were 2 x 10(-5)-10(-2), 1.0 x 10(-5)-10(-2) and 3.2 x 10(-5)-10(-2) M corresponding to the 3 electrodes. The optimum pH range was 2-7. The selectivity coefficient values were calculated for different inorganic cations, amino acids and pharmaceutical amines. Direct potentiometry and potentiometric titration were applied for the determination of promethazine in its pure form or in its pharmaceutical preparation. The recovery range and the relative standard deviation values for potentiometric titration were 98.6\%-100.1\% and 0.79\%-1.96\% (4 determinations), respectively. For direct potentiometry, the corresponding recovery values were 98.6\% and 99.5\%, and the relative standard deviation values were 1.49\% and 1.02\% (4 determinations).
Online
PDF
جامعة المنصورة
جامعة الاسكندرية
جامعة القاهرة
جامعة سوهاج
جامعة الفيوم
جامعة بنها
جامعة دمياط
جامعة بورسعيد
جامعة حلوان
جامعة السويس
شراقوة
جامعة المنيا
جامعة دمنهور
جامعة المنوفية
جامعة أسوان
جامعة جنوب الوادى
جامعة قناة السويس
جامعة عين شمس
جامعة أسيوط
جامعة كفر الشيخ
جامعة السادات
جامعة طنطا
جامعة بنى سويف