Chemoinformatic Methods for Predicting Interference in Drug of Abuse/Toxicology Immunoassays

Faculty Not Specified Year: 2009
Type of Publication: Article Pages: 1203-1213
Authors: DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.118638
Journal: CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AMER ASSOC CLINICAL CHEMISTRY Volume: 55
Research Area: Medical Laboratory Technology ISSN ISI:000266687200022
Keywords : Chemoinformatic Methods , Predicting Interference , Drug , Abuse/Toxicology    
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Immunoassays used for routine drug of abuse (DOA) and toxicology screening may be limited by cross-reacting compounds able to bind to the antibodies in a manner similar to the target molecule(s). To date, there has been little systematic investigation using computational tools to predict cross-reactive compounds. METHODS: Commonly used molecular similarity methods enabled calculation of structural similarity for a wide range of compounds (prescription and over-the-counter medications, illicit drugs, and clinically Significant metabolites) to the target molecules of DOA/toxicology screening assays. We used various molecular descriptors (MDL public keys, functional class fingerprints, and pharmacophore fingerprints) and the Tanimoto similarity coefficient. These data were then compared with cross-reactivity data in the package inserts of immunoassays marketed for in vitro diagnostic use. Previously untested compounds that were predicted to have a high probability of cross-reactivity were tested. RESULTS: Molecular similarity calculated using MDL public keys and the Tanimoto similarity coefficient showed a strong and statistically significant separation between cross-reactive and non-cross-reactive compounds. This result was validated experimentally by discovery of additional cross-reactive compounds based on computational predictions. CONCLUSIONS: The computational methods employed are amenable toward rapid screening of databases of drugs, metabolites, and endogenous molecules and may be useful for identifying cross-reactive molecules that would be otherwise unsuspected. These methods may also have value in focusing cross-reactivity testing on compounds with high similarity to the target molecule(s) and limiting testing of compounds with low similarity and very low probability of cross-reacting with the assay. (C) 2009 American Association for Clinical Chemistry
   
  Online    
PDF  
       
Tweet