Comparative biochemical studies on steroidogenic compounds in chickens (Retracted article. See vol. 91, pg. 498, 2011)

Faculty Veterinary Medicine Year: 2010
Type of Publication: Article Pages: 168-173
Authors: DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2010.03.010
Journal: RESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE ELSEVIER SCI LTD Volume: 89
Research Area: Veterinary Sciences ISSN ISI:000282120400006
Keywords : Estrogen, Nordette, Lutofolone, Serum enzymes, Chickens    
Abstract:
Comparative studies of the effects of Nordette and Lutofolone on 15 days old chicken were carried out to determine their effects on growth performance, biochemical parameters and an analysis of hormonal residues in the liver and muscle. Sixty chickens were equally divided into three groups. Group 1 was served as a control. Groups 2 and 3 were treated daily with Nordette (1 mg/kg B.W.) mixed in the ration and Lutofolone (0.5 mg/kg B.W.) orally via a bent stainless steel feeding tube, respectively, for 30 days (from the 15th till the 45th day old). Then these treated groups were left for another 15 days without any treatment. Blood samples were collected at 45 and 60 days old and used for biochemical studies, while liver and muscles were excised from each chicken and used to prepare tissue homogenate for estimation of hormonal residues (estrogen and progesterone). Both drugs caused a gain in body weight. They also increased several serum variables, including alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), cholesterol, creatine kinase (CK), creatinine and uric acid, and reduced total proteins, albumin and globulin levels at 30 days post-administration. Moreover, this study exhibited a significant increase in the levels of estrogen residues in the liver and muscle. Estrogen level was much higher in the liver than muscles. However, some of these findings were insignificant changed at 15 days post-stopping of the hormones. Data on the biochemical parameters and residue levels obtained from these results clearly indicate that anabolic agents may entail a special risk to the chickens and probably to the consumer. (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
   
  Online    
PDF  
       
Tweet