IMPROVED SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC METHODS FOR DETERMINATION OF SOME CATIONS USING SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS

Conclusions:The proposed method has a wide determination range and a low detection limit. The new spectrophotometic procedure can be recommended for zinc(II) determination in pharmaceutical preparations since they give results comparable to those of AAS methods and they involve less sophisticated and cheap instrumentation.Conclusions:The proposed method has a wide determination range and a low detection limit. The new spectrophotometic procedure can be recommended for zinc(II) determination in pharmaceutical preparations since they give results comparable to those of AAS methods and they involve less sophisticated and cheap instrumentation.Conclusions:The proposed method has a wide determination range and a low detection limit. The new spectrophotometic procedure can be recommended for zinc(II) determination in pharmaceutical preparations since they give results comparable to those of AAS methods and they involve less sophisticated and cheap instrumentation.Conclusions:The proposed method has a wide determination range and a low detection limit. The new spectrophotometic procedure can be recommended for zinc(II) determination in pharmaceutical preparations since they give results comparable to those of AAS methods and they involve less sophisticated and cheap instrumentation.Conclusions:The proposed method has a wide determination range and a low detection limit. The new spectrophotometic procedure can be recommended for zinc(II) determination in pharmaceutical preparations since they give results comparable to those of AAS methods and they involve less sophisticated and cheap instrumentation.Conclusions:The proposed method has a wide determination range and a low detection limit. The new spectrophotometic procedure can be recommended for zinc(II) determination in pharmaceutical preparations since they give results comparable to those of AAS methods and they involve less sophisticated and cheap instrumentation.Conclusions:The proposed method has a wide determination range and a low detection limit. The new spectrophotometic procedure can be recommended for zinc(II) determination in pharmaceutical preparations since they give results comparable to those of AAS methods and they involve less sophisticated and cheap instrumentation.Conclusions:The proposed method has a wide determination range and a low detection limit. The new spectrophotometic procedure can be recommended for zinc(II) determination in pharmaceutical preparations since they give results comparable to those of AAS methods and they involve less sophisticated and cheap instrumentation.Conclusions:The proposed method has a wide determination range and a low detection limit. The new spectrophotometic procedure can be recommended for zinc(II) determination in pharmaceutical preparations since they give results comparable to those of AAS methods and they involve less sophisticated and cheap instrumentation.Conclusions:The proposed method has a wide determination range and a low detection limit. The new spectrophotometic procedure can be recommended for zinc(II) determination in pharmaceutical preparations since they give results comparable to those of AAS methods and they involve less sophisticated and cheap instrumentation.Conclusions:The proposed method has a wide determination range and a low detection limit. The new spectrophotometic procedure can be recommended for zinc(II) determination in pharmaceutical preparations since they give results comparable to those of AAS methods and they involve less sophisticated and cheap instrumentation.Conclusions:The proposed method has a wide determination range and a low detection limit. The new spectrophotometic procedure can be recommended for zinc(II) determination in pharmaceutical preparations since they give results comparable to those of AAS methods and they involve less sophisticated and cheap instrumentation.Conclusions:The proposed method has a wide determination range and a low detection limit. The new spectrophotometic procedure can be recommended for zinc(II) determination in pharmaceutical preparations since they give results comparable to those of AAS methods and they involve less sophisticated and cheap instrumentation.Conclusions:The proposed method has a wide determination range and a low detection limit. The new spectrophotometic procedure can be recommended for zinc(II) determination in pharmaceutical preparations since they give results comparable to those of AAS methods and they involve less sophisticated and cheap instrumentation.Conclusions:The proposed method has a wide determination range and a low detection limit. The new spectrophotometic procedure can be recommended for zinc(II) determination in pharmaceutical preparations since they give results comparable to those of AAS methods and they involve less sophisticated and cheap instrumentation.Conclusions:The proposed method has a wide determination range and a low detection limit. The new spectrophotometic procedure can be recommended for zinc(II) determination in pharmaceutical preparations since they give results comparable to those of AAS methods and they involve less sophisticated and cheap instrumentation.Conclusions:The proposed method has a wide determination range and a low detection limit. The new spectrophotometic procedure can be recommended for zinc(II) determination in pharmaceutical preparations since they give results comparable to those of AAS methods and they involve less sophisticated and cheap instrumentation.Conclusions:The proposed method has a wide determination range and a low detection limit. The new spectrophotometic procedure can be recommended for zinc(II) determination in pharmaceutical preparations since they give results comparable to those of AAS methods and they involve less sophisticated and cheap instrumentation.Conclusions:The proposed method has a wide determination range and a low detection limit. The new spectrophotometic procedure can be recommended for zinc(II) determination in pharmaceutical preparations since they give results comparable to those of AAS methods and they involve less sophisticated and cheap instrumentation.Conclusions:The proposed method has a wide determination range and a low detection limit. The new spectrophotometic procedure can be recommended for zinc(II) determination in pharmaceutical preparations since they give results comparable to those of AAS methods and they involve less sophisticated and cheap instrumentation.Conclusions:The proposed method has a wide determination range and a low detection limit. The new spectrophotometic procedure can be recommended for zinc(II) determination in pharmaceutical preparations since they give results comparable to those of AAS methods and they involve less sophisticated and cheap instrumentation.Conclusions:The proposed method has a wide determination range and a low detection limit. The new spectrophotometic procedure can be recommended for zinc(II) determination in pharmaceutical preparations since they give results comparable to those of AAS methods and they involve less sophisticated and cheap instrumentation.Conclusions:The proposed method has a wide determination range and a low detection limit. The new spectrophotometic procedure can be recommended for zinc(II) determination in pharmaceutical preparations since they give results comparable to those of AAS methods and they involve less sophisticated and cheap instrumentation.Conclusions:The proposed method has a wide determination range and a low detection limit. The new spectrophotometic procedure can be recommended for zinc(II) determination in pharmaceutical preparations since they give results comparable to those of AAS methods and they involve less sophisticated and cheap instrumentation.Conclusions:The proposed method has a wide determination range and a low detection limit. The new spectrophotometic procedure can be recommended for zinc(II) determination in pharmaceutical preparations since they give results comparable to those of AAS methods and they involve less sophisticated and cheap instrumentation.Conclusions:The proposed method has a wide determination range and a low detection limit. The new spectrophotometic procedure can be recommended for zinc(II) determination in pharmaceutical preparations since they give results comparable to those of AAS methods and they involve less sophisticated and cheap instrumentation.